Your search
Results 10 resources
-
Punitive damages have always attracted a lukewarm reception in Quebec law. This article analyses the recent de Montigny and Ward judgments of the Supreme Court, which resolve some important issues about which Quebec doctrine and case law were divided. First, the Supreme Court stated that punitive damages constitute an autonomous remedy that may be sought independently of a condemnation in compensatory damages. It also held that punitive damages may pursue the goals of punishment, deterrence and denunciation. Lastly, the Court sends a message of moderation as regards the quantum of punitive damages.
-
This study analyzes the arguments employed by Quebec judges when deciding whether a clause is abusive under article 1437 of the Civil Code of Québec. This analysis is inspired by the common law distinction between the substantive and procedural aspects of contractual unfairness. Thus, courts often invoke substantive factors to assess a clause’s abusive character, such as the equivalence of the obligations, proportionality, reciprocity, commutativity, departure from the usual obligations or from the essential obligation and causal link. However, it was found that courts also rely on procedural criteria to assess abuse, such as the information given to the adhering party concerning the contents of the contract as well as compliance with the adhering party’s reasonable expectations.
-
During Justice Louis LeBel’s fifteen-year tenure at the Supreme Court of Canada, Québec’s distinct character was taken into account in several decisions, for example in cases involving the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or language rights. Although Québec was not always victorious, the Supreme Court still recognized the legitimacy of Québec’s language policy and, as a result, gave Québec more control over admissions to English-language schools than is evident at first sight. However, the most significant recognition of Québec’s specificity is found in cases connected with the constitutional amending formula. In some of its key decisions, the Supreme Court adopted a “contractual” vision of the origins of Canada’s constitution and interpreted it in a way explicitly intended to provide protection for the interests of the provinces, including Québec’s specific interests.
-
This chapter reviews the history of treaty-making with the Indigenous peoples of Canada. After an initial period of roughly equal relationships, colonial authorities increasingly used treaties as a domestic law concept aimed at securing control over Indigenous land. The practice was continued after Confederation, but there appears to be a major misunderstanding as to the terms of those treaties, in particular as to the purported extinguishment of Aboriginal title. After a 50-year hiatus, treaty-making resumed in 1975 with the signing of ‘land claims agreements’ in most of the Canadian north. These agreements not only provide for the sharing of land, they also contain detailed provisions with respect to co-management of natural resources and, in some cases, self-government. Canadian law now affords statutory and constitutional protection to treaty rights, and courts are prepared to take into account extrinsic and oral evidence in interpreting treaties.
Explore
Resource type
- Book (3)
- Book Section (1)
- Encyclopedia Article (1)
- Journal Article (5)
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(10)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)
- 2003 (1)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (7)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (2)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)